wtfeWays They Frame Engineering
日本語

The NordicsvsChina

北欧と中国NORDCN

Seen from the Nordics: each line below describes China relative to the Nordics.

Swap: see the Nordics from China

Culture Map: eight scales

Erin Meyer's eight scales, sorted by how far apart the Nordics and China sit, largest gap first.

Filled dot: the Nordics, where you are looking fromHollow ring: China

Where you will notice the difference6 scales

  1. Leading

    China keeps more distance between boss and team than the Nordics (5 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −3, SE −3, FI −2

    The Nordics −3, China +2, on a line from −3 (Egalitarian) to +3 (Hierarchical).

  2. Communicating

    China leaves more to be read between the lines than the Nordics (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2, SE −1, FI −1

    The Nordics −2, China +2, on a line from −3 (Low-context) to +3 (High-context).

  3. Deciding

    China leaves decisions to the person in charge more than the Nordics (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2, SE −2

    The Nordics −2, China +2, on a line from −3 (Consensual) to +3 (Top-down).

  4. Trusting

    China builds trust through personal relationships more than the Nordics (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2

    The Nordics −2, China +2, on a line from −3 (Task-based) to +3 (Relationship-based).

  5. Disagreeing

    China avoids open disagreement more than the Nordics (3 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −1, SE +1

    The Nordics −1, China +2, on a line from −3 (Confrontational) to +3 (Avoids confrontation).

  6. Evaluating

    China gives negative feedback more indirectly than the Nordics (2 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −1, FI −1

    The Nordics −1, China +1, on a line from −3 (Direct negative feedback) to +3 (Indirect negative feedback).

Not placed2 scales

These scales are left unmarked: either Meyer leaves a country off the scale or no source places it, and drawing it anyway would be guessing.

  • PersuadingMeyer leaves China off this scale and describes its reasoning as holistic
  • SchedulingNo source places China on this scale
Positions are read by eye from Erin Meyer's published charts and rounded to seven steps. A step means “further towards that pole”, not a measured distance. How the positions were read

Hofstede: six dimensions

Scores from 0 to 100, sorted by the gap between the Nordics and China. They describe national averages, not either country's character.

The Nordics are not one country: each score is the average of four national scores (Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway).

  1. Power distance

    China scores 52 points higher than the Nordics (80 against 28)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 31, Finland 33, Denmark 18, Norway 31

    The Nordics 28, China 80, on a line from 0 (Low power distance) to 100 (High power distance).

  2. Motivation towards achievement and success

    China scores 52 points higher than the Nordics (66 against 14)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 5, Finland 26, Denmark 16, Norway 8

    The Nordics 14, China 66, on a line from 0 (Consensus-oriented) to 100 (Decisive).

  3. Indulgence

    China scores 41 points lower than the Nordics (24 against 65)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 78, Finland 57, Denmark 70, Norway 55

    The Nordics 65, China 24, on a line from 0 (Restrained) to 100 (Indulgent).

  4. Individualism

    China scores 40 points lower than the Nordics (43 against 83)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 87, Finland 75, Denmark 89, Norway 81

    The Nordics 83, China 43, on a line from 0 (Collectivist) to 100 (Individualist).

  5. Long-term orientation

    China scores 20 points higher than the Nordics (77 against 57)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 52, Finland 63, Denmark 59, Norway 55

    The Nordics 57, China 77, on a line from 0 (Short-term) to 100 (Long-term).

  6. Uncertainty avoidance

    China scores 10 points lower than the Nordics (30 against 40)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 29, Finland 59, Denmark 23, Norway 50

    The Nordics 40, China 30, on a line from 0 (Tolerant of ambiguity) to 100 (Avoids ambiguity).

Country averages. About 80% of variation in values is between people inside a country (Taras et al. 2016).Source: The Culture Factor — Country comparison tool (2026).About the Hofstede dimensions

What the sources say, theme by theme

Entries for the Nordics and China, side by side on wide screens. Each keeps its own confidence label and citations.

Design & quality

The Nordics3 claims

China3 claims

Failure & risk

The Nordics3 claims

China2 claims

Feedback & code review

The Nordics4 claims

China3 claims

Hierarchy & decisions

The Nordics5 claims

China2 claims

Communication & docs

The Nordics3 claims

China4 claims

Work & careers

The Nordics4 claims

China4 claims

Open source & community

The Nordics5 claims

China5 claims