wtfeWays They Frame Engineering
日本語

Chinavsthe Nordics

中国と北欧CNNORD

Seen from China: each line below describes the Nordics relative to China.

Swap: see China from the Nordics

Culture Map: eight scales

Erin Meyer's eight scales, sorted by how far apart China and the Nordics sit, largest gap first.

Filled dot: China, where you are looking fromHollow ring: the Nordics

Where you will notice the difference6 scales

  1. Leading

    The Nordics keep less distance between boss and team than China (5 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −3, SE −3, FI −2

    China +2, the Nordics −3, on a line from −3 (Egalitarian) to +3 (Hierarchical).

  2. Communicating

    The Nordics spell things out more explicitly than China (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2, SE −1, FI −1

    China +2, the Nordics −2, on a line from −3 (Low-context) to +3 (High-context).

  3. Deciding

    The Nordics decide by group agreement more than China (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2, SE −2

    China +2, the Nordics −2, on a line from −3 (Consensual) to +3 (Top-down).

  4. Trusting

    The Nordics build trust through reliable work more than China (4 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −2

    China +2, the Nordics −2, on a line from −3 (Task-based) to +3 (Relationship-based).

  5. Disagreeing

    The Nordics are more willing to disagree openly than China (3 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −1, SE +1

    China +2, the Nordics −1, on a line from −3 (Confrontational) to +3 (Avoids confrontation).

  6. Evaluating

    The Nordics give negative feedback more directly than China (2 steps)

    NORD by country: DK −1, FI −1

    China +1, the Nordics −1, on a line from −3 (Direct negative feedback) to +3 (Indirect negative feedback).

Not placed2 scales

These scales are left unmarked: either Meyer leaves a country off the scale or no source places it, and drawing it anyway would be guessing.

  • PersuadingMeyer leaves China off this scale and describes its reasoning as holistic
  • SchedulingNo source places China on this scale
Positions are read by eye from Erin Meyer's published charts and rounded to seven steps. A step means “further towards that pole”, not a measured distance. How the positions were read

Hofstede: six dimensions

Scores from 0 to 100, sorted by the gap between China and the Nordics. They describe national averages, not either country's character.

The Nordics are not one country: each score is the average of four national scores (Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway).

  1. Power distance

    The Nordics score 52 points lower than China (28 against 80)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 31, Finland 33, Denmark 18, Norway 31

    China 80, the Nordics 28, on a line from 0 (Low power distance) to 100 (High power distance).

  2. Motivation towards achievement and success

    The Nordics score 52 points lower than China (14 against 66)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 5, Finland 26, Denmark 16, Norway 8

    China 66, the Nordics 14, on a line from 0 (Consensus-oriented) to 100 (Decisive).

  3. Indulgence

    The Nordics score 41 points higher than China (65 against 24)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 78, Finland 57, Denmark 70, Norway 55

    China 24, the Nordics 65, on a line from 0 (Restrained) to 100 (Indulgent).

  4. Individualism

    The Nordics score 40 points higher than China (83 against 43)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 87, Finland 75, Denmark 89, Norway 81

    China 43, the Nordics 83, on a line from 0 (Collectivist) to 100 (Individualist).

  5. Long-term orientation

    The Nordics score 20 points lower than China (57 against 77)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 52, Finland 63, Denmark 59, Norway 55

    China 77, the Nordics 57, on a line from 0 (Short-term) to 100 (Long-term).

  6. Uncertainty avoidance

    The Nordics score 10 points higher than China (40 against 30)

    The Nordics: average of Sweden 29, Finland 59, Denmark 23, Norway 50

    China 30, the Nordics 40, on a line from 0 (Tolerant of ambiguity) to 100 (Avoids ambiguity).

Country averages. About 80% of variation in values is between people inside a country (Taras et al. 2016).Source: The Culture Factor — Country comparison tool (2026).About the Hofstede dimensions

What the sources say, theme by theme

Entries for China and the Nordics, side by side on wide screens. Each keeps its own confidence label and citations.

Design & quality

China3 claims

The Nordics3 claims

Failure & risk

China2 claims

The Nordics3 claims

Feedback & code review

China3 claims

The Nordics4 claims

Hierarchy & decisions

China2 claims

The Nordics5 claims

Communication & docs

China4 claims

The Nordics3 claims

Work & careers

China4 claims

The Nordics4 claims

Open source & community

China5 claims

The Nordics5 claims