The United StatesvsSouth Korea
アメリカと韓国USKR
Seen from the United States: each line below describes South Korea relative to the United States.
Culture Map: eight scales
Erin Meyer's eight scales, sorted by how far apart the United States and South Korea sit, largest gap first.
Filled dot: the United States, where you are looking fromHollow ring: South Korea
Where you will notice the difference5 scales
Communicating
South Korea leaves more to be read between the lines than the United States (5 steps)
The United States −3, South Korea +2, on a line from −3 (Low-context) to +3 (High-context).
Trusting
South Korea builds trust through personal relationships more than the United States (5 steps)
The United States −3, South Korea +2, on a line from −3 (Task-based) to +3 (Relationship-based).
Leading
South Korea keeps more distance between boss and team than the United States (3 steps)
The United States −1, South Korea +2, on a line from −3 (Egalitarian) to +3 (Hierarchical).
Evaluating
South Korea gives negative feedback more indirectly than the United States (2 steps)
The United States 0, South Korea +2, on a line from −3 (Direct negative feedback) to +3 (Indirect negative feedback).
Disagreeing
South Korea avoids open disagreement more than the United States (2 steps)
The United States 0, South Korea +2, on a line from −3 (Confrontational) to +3 (Avoids confrontation).
Not placed3 scales
These scales are left unmarked: either Meyer leaves a country off the scale or no source places it, and drawing it anyway would be guessing.
- PersuadingMeyer leaves South Korea off this scale and describes its reasoning as holistic
- Deciding, SchedulingNo source places South Korea on these scales
Hofstede: six dimensions
Scores from 0 to 100, sorted by the gap between the United States and South Korea. They describe national averages, not either country's character.
Uncertainty avoidance
South Korea scores 39 points higher than the United States (85 against 46)
The United States 46, South Korea 85, on a line from 0 (Tolerant of ambiguity) to 100 (Avoids ambiguity).
Indulgence
South Korea scores 39 points lower than the United States (29 against 68)
The United States 68, South Korea 29, on a line from 0 (Restrained) to 100 (Indulgent).
Long-term orientation
South Korea scores 36 points higher than the United States (86 against 50)
The United States 50, South Korea 86, on a line from 0 (Short-term) to 100 (Long-term).
Motivation towards achievement and success
South Korea scores 23 points lower than the United States (39 against 62)
The United States 62, South Korea 39, on a line from 0 (Consensus-oriented) to 100 (Decisive).
Power distance
South Korea scores 20 points higher than the United States (60 against 40)
The United States 40, South Korea 60, on a line from 0 (Low power distance) to 100 (High power distance).
Individualism
South Korea scores 2 points lower than the United States (58 against 60)
The United States 60, South Korea 58, on a line from 0 (Collectivist) to 100 (Individualist).
What the sources say, theme by theme
Entries for the United States and South Korea, side by side on wide screens. Each keeps its own confidence label and citations.
Design & quality
United States3 claims
At Google, engineers write a relatively informal design doc before writing code. According to Malte Ubl (2020), the point is not an exhaustive specification but a record of the trade-offs and alternatives considered.
Thin1 source2020us-design-1
Ubl says a design doc should be as long as necessary and as short as possible, and distinguishes it from a heavyweight waterfall-style specification.
Thin1 source2015Datedus-design-2
Meyer places the United States on the applications-first side of the Persuading scale. A book summary describes this as starting from conclusions and examples and favoring the practical how over the theoretical why.
Thin1 sourceus-design-3
South Korea3 claims
A 2013 ZDNet Korea column argued that the ppalli-ppalli ("hurry, hurry") culture leads to poor knowledge sharing, architectures that do not scale and dependence on particular developers, and so ends up slowing software development.
Thin1 source2013Datedkr-design-1
A columnist who worked with Korean teams as an outside partner observed that developers make up about 80% of a team and testers are few. He adds that this is not necessarily a weakness in an agile setting.
Thin1 source2024kr-design-2
- 정철환 칼럼: 개발자와 테스터 (CIO Korea) (2024)
SPRi (2014) and a ZDNet Korea op-ed (2023) argue that multi-tier subcontracting persists in public-sector SI projects, locking smaller firms into low-value coding so that they never build planning and design skills.
Attested2 sources2023kr-design-3
Failure & risk
United States2 claims
The Google SRE Book (2016) codifies the blameless postmortem. It identifies contributing causes without blaming individuals or teams and assumes that everyone involved acted with good intentions.
Well attested1 source2016us-failure-1
At F8 in 2014, Zuckerberg changed Facebook's motto from "Move fast and break things" to "Move fast with stable infra." His reason was that at Facebook's scale, the time spent fixing breakage outweighed the gain in speed.
Attested1 source2014Datedus-failure-2
South Korea3 claims
Introducing its 2021 developer conference SLASH21, Toss presented a culture that values fast execution over fear of failure.
Well attested1 source2021kr-failure-1
After a fire at the Pangyo data center caused a major outage in October 2022, Kakao presented its root cause analysis and prevention measures at if(kakao) dev 2022 that December. The measures include data center redundancy and triple redundancy for operations tooling.
Well attested2 sources2022kr-failure-2
Woowa Brothers, the company behind Baemin, lists "don't blame people" among its principles for KPT retrospectives. An SK Devocean presentation says the hardest step in a postmortem is not holding the person responsible to account.
Well attested2 sources2021kr-failure-3
Feedback & code review
United States3 claims
According to Meyer, Americans are often taught to wrap negative messages in positive ones (the feedback sandwich). For this reason she places the United States in the middle of the scale for delivering negative feedback.
Attested1 source2014Datedus-feedback-1
A blog explainer on Meyer's evaluating scale notes a common mismatch: Dutch and German colleagues take American praise at face value, while Americans find Dutch and German criticism too harsh.
Thin1 source2016us-feedback-2
A study of more than 70,000 GitHub pull requests from 17 countries (Rastogi et al., 2018) found that pull requests were more likely to be accepted when the reviewer and the submitter were in the same country.
Well attested1 source2018us-feedback-3
South Korea2 claims
The "Pn rule", which marks each review comment from P1 (must fix) to P5 (minor opinion), started at Banksalad and has been adopted by Woowa Brothers, Daangn and others.
Attested2 sources2024kr-feedback-1
One Woowa Brothers team has a rule that reviewers leave a comment praising the author even when they have nothing to correct.
Well attested1 source2022kr-feedback-2
Hierarchy & decisions
United States2 claims
Meyer classifies the United States as egalitarian but top-down (HBR, 2017). People use first names and are encouraged to speak up, but the boss decides quickly, and the decision can be revisited when new arguments appear.
Attested1 source2017us-hierarchy-1
In the same article, Meyer reports that to Japanese managers an American boss can look flat on the surface yet highly autocratic in how decisions are made.
Attested1 source2017us-hierarchy-2
South Korea4 claims
On Meyer's Leading scale, South Korea is placed toward the hierarchical end. The evidence is a secondary excerpt from the book.
Attested1 sourcekr-hierarchy-1
A Substack essay argues that in chaebol such as Samsung, Hyundai and LG, decision rights are concentrated at the top to an unusual degree even by East Asian standards.
Thin1 source2025kr-hierarchy-2
Under Toss's DRI system, discussion is open regardless of rank, but one directly responsible individual makes the final call. Information is shared on a "100 inside, 0 outside" principle.
Well attested2 sources2022kr-hierarchy-3
Kakao has had staff call each other by English names since its founding in 2006, but its affiliate Kakao Games returned to the honorific "-nim" in 2024. News coverage also quotes industry voices saying many companies have flat forms of address but not a flat culture.
Attested2 sources2024kr-hierarchy-4
Communication & docs
United States4 claims
Meyer places the United States at the most low-context end of the Communicating scale. A book summary describes a preference for saying things explicitly and for repeating and summarizing key points.
Thin1 sourceus-communication-1
According to Bezos's 2017 shareholder letter, Amazon does not use PowerPoint. Meetings start with everyone silently reading a six-page narrative memo, and memos carry no author's name because they come from the whole team.
Well attested1 source2018us-communication-2
According to CNBC (2018), the practice began with a 2004 email from Bezos. He explained that a good four-page memo is harder to write than a 20-page slide deck because the narrative structure forces better thinking.
Attested1 source2018us-communication-3
According to a blog post by Slab, Stripe also rarely uses slides. Meetings begin with silent reading of a memo, followed by comments on the document.
Thin1 sourceus-communication-4
South Korea2 claims
On Meyer's Communicating scale, South Korea sits with Japan and Indonesia at the most high-context end.
Thin1 sourcekr-communication-1
One practitioner argues that when agile is imposed from the top while executives and middle managers keep their old thinking, the only result is a heavier load on the teams.
Thin1 sourcekr-communication-2
Work & careers
United States5 claims
According to the BLS, median employee tenure in January 2024 was 3.9 years overall, the lowest since January 2002. In the private sector it was 3.5 years.
Well attested1 source2024us-work-1
- BLS: Employee Tenure in 2024 (2024)
At-will employment is the default in every state except Montana. Unless the reason is illegal, either the employer or the employee can end the employment relationship at any time.
Well attested1 sourceus-work-2
According to layoffs.fyi figures cited by TechCrunch, tech layoffs in 2024 exceeded 150,000 people at 549 companies. The peak was 2023, with about 260,000.
Attested1 source2024us-work-3
In the Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2025, 45% of US respondents work fully remote, the highest share among the top responding countries. Median salaries were $200k for engineering managers, $175k for back-end developers, and $138k for full-stack developers.
Well attested1 source2025us-work-4
In Staff Engineer (2021), Will Larson sorts Staff+ individual-contributor roles, which do not require becoming a manager, into four archetypes: Tech Lead, Architect, Solver, and Right Hand.
Attested1 source2021us-work-5
- Will Larson: Staff Engineer (2021)
South Korea7 claims
OECD data put South Korea's annual working hours in 2023 at 1,872, about 200 hours above the OECD average.
Attested1 source2024kr-work-1
News reports say working conditions in the IT and game industries improved substantially after the 52-hour workweek cap took effect in 2018.
Attested1 source2023kr-work-2
In KOCCA's 2024 survey of game industry workers (n=1,510), 34.3% had experienced crunch and 69.9% were on an all-inclusive wage system, which bundles overtime into a fixed salary. At companies with fewer than 50 employees the share exceeded 90%.
Attested2 sources2025kr-work-3
Remote work policies vary by company. Naver kept Connected Work, which lets staff choose fully remote or three office days a week every six months, while Kakao effectively returned everyone to the office from 2024.
Attested2 sources2024kr-work-4
After the scramble for developers in 2021, the market reversed: in a 2024 Grepp survey, 34% of companies said they would hire fewer developers.
Attested1 source2024kr-work-5
In the 2021 Programmers developer survey, 63.1% of respondents worked at companies with 50 or fewer developers.
Well attested1 source2021kr-work-6
- 2021 프로그래머스 개발자 설문조사 (2021)
Reports say that in multi-tier SI subcontracting, freelance developers at the bottom of the chain are especially exposed to unpaid fees when a project is halted or an intermediary goes bankrupt.
Attested2 sources2019kr-work-7
Open source & community
United States2 claims
According to Octoverse 2025, the number of US developers on GitHub grew from 10.2 million in 2020 to 28 million in 2025, the most of any country. The US ranks second to India in open source contributors and first in total contributions.
Well attested1 source2025us-oss-1
- GitHub Octoverse 2025 (2025)
The same Octoverse 2025 report says the US, UK, and Canada more than doubled their developer counts from 2020 to 2025, while India and Brazil more than quadrupled. Its 2030 projection puts India ahead of the United States.
Well attested1 source2025us-oss-2
- GitHub Octoverse 2025 (2025)
South Korea4 claims
In GitHub Octoverse 2023, South Korea had more than 1.9 million developers, up 22% year on year.
Well attested1 source2023kr-oss-1
NIPA runs the Open Source Contribution Academy, which supports Korean developers in contributing to global open source projects. In 2024 it selected 282 participants from 931 applicants, and it held a launch ceremony again in 2026.
Well attested2 sources2026kr-oss-2
Open source projects from Korean companies include NAVER's APM tool Pinpoint (about 13.9k stars) and LINE's Armeria (about 5.1k stars).
Attested2 sourceskr-oss-3
In the EF EPI 2024, South Korea ranked 50th of 116 countries and regions, well ahead of Japan (92nd).
Attested1 source2024kr-oss-4