The Nordicsvsthe Netherlands
北欧とオランダNORDNL
Seen from the Nordics: each line below describes the Netherlands relative to the Nordics.
Culture Map: eight scales
Erin Meyer's eight scales, sorted by how far apart the Nordics and the Netherlands sit, largest gap first.
Filled dot: the Nordics, where you are looking fromHollow ring: the Netherlands
Where you will notice the difference2 scales
Evaluating
The Netherlands gives negative feedback more directly than the Nordics (2 steps)
NORD by country: DK −1, FI −1
The Nordics −1, the Netherlands −3, on a line from −3 (Direct negative feedback) to +3 (Indirect negative feedback).
Disagreeing
The Netherlands is more willing to disagree openly than the Nordics (1 step)
NORD by country: DK −1, SE +1
The Nordics −1, the Netherlands −2, on a line from −3 (Confrontational) to +3 (Avoids confrontation).
Where you are close6 scales
Communicating
The Nordics and the Netherlands sit on the same step
NORD by country: DK −2, SE −1, FI −1
The Nordics −2, the Netherlands −2, on a line from −3 (Low-context) to +3 (High-context).
The Nordics +1, the Netherlands +1, on a line from −3 (Principles-first) to +3 (Applications-first).
The Nordics −3, the Netherlands −3, on a line from −3 (Egalitarian) to +3 (Hierarchical).
The Nordics −2, the Netherlands −2, on a line from −3 (Consensual) to +3 (Top-down).
The Nordics −2, the Netherlands −2, on a line from −3 (Task-based) to +3 (Relationship-based).
The Nordics −2, the Netherlands −2, on a line from −3 (Linear time) to +3 (Flexible time).
Hofstede: six dimensions
Scores from 0 to 100, sorted by the gap between the Nordics and the Netherlands. They describe national averages, not either country's character.
The Nordics are not one country: each score is the average of four national scores (Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Norway).
Individualism
The Netherlands scores 17 points higher than the Nordics (100 against 83)
The Nordics: average of Sweden 87, Finland 75, Denmark 89, Norway 81
The Nordics 83, the Netherlands 100, on a line from 0 (Collectivist) to 100 (Individualist).
Uncertainty avoidance
The Netherlands scores 13 points higher than the Nordics (53 against 40)
The Nordics: average of Sweden 29, Finland 59, Denmark 23, Norway 50
The Nordics 40, the Netherlands 53, on a line from 0 (Tolerant of ambiguity) to 100 (Avoids ambiguity).
Power distance
The Netherlands scores 10 points higher than the Nordics (38 against 28)
The Nordics: average of Sweden 31, Finland 33, Denmark 18, Norway 31
The Nordics 28, the Netherlands 38, on a line from 0 (Low power distance) to 100 (High power distance).
Long-term orientation
The Netherlands scores 10 points higher than the Nordics (67 against 57)
The Nordics: average of Sweden 52, Finland 63, Denmark 59, Norway 55
The Nordics 57, the Netherlands 67, on a line from 0 (Short-term) to 100 (Long-term).
Indulgence
The Netherlands scores 3 points higher than the Nordics (68 against 65)
The Nordics: average of Sweden 78, Finland 57, Denmark 70, Norway 55
The Nordics 65, the Netherlands 68, on a line from 0 (Restrained) to 100 (Indulgent).
Motivation towards achievement and success
The Netherlands and the Nordics both score 14
The Nordics: average of Sweden 5, Finland 26, Denmark 16, Norway 8
The Nordics 14, the Netherlands 14, on a line from 0 (Consensus-oriented) to 100 (Decisive).
What the sources say, theme by theme
Entries for the Nordics and the Netherlands, side by side on wide screens. Each keeps its own confidence label and citations.
Design & quality
The Nordics3 claims
Abrahamsson et al. at VTT, the Technical Research Centre of Finland (2002, VTT Publications 478), wrote an early systematic review comparing agile methods, cited more than 200 times in Scopus. It shows that Finland had an early presence in agile research.
Attested1 source2002Datednordics-design-1
In its 2014 culture write-up, Spotify promoted small, frequent releases and being "loosely coupled, tightly aligned," and made Scrum practices optional. The company itself said this was a journey in progress, not a finished model.
Well attested1 source2014Datednordics-design-2
At Supercell (Finland), cells of roughly 5 to 15 people own a game's whole life cycle, including the decision to kill it. CEO Ilkka Paananen said at Slush 2024 that there is no management greenlight meeting.
Attested1 source2024nordics-design-3
Netherlands2 claims
Guido van Rossum created Python at CWI in Amsterdam. He names his frustration with ABC's lack of extensibility and the system administration needs of the Amoeba distributed OS group as motives. He started over the 1989 Christmas holidays and released 0.9.0 on 1991-02-20.
Well attested2 sources2009Datednl-design-1
According to Thomke (HBR, 2020), Booking.com runs more than 1,000 experiments at once and over 25,000 a year. Its internal rule is that anyone can test anything without management's permission.
Attested1 source2020nl-design-2
Failure & risk
The Nordics3 claims
In Kniberg's 2014 video, Spotify called itself fail-friendly and valued fast recovery over failure avoidance. Postmortems dealt with what happened and what to change rather than who was to blame, and systems were designed to keep the blast radius small.
Attested1 source2014Datednordics-failure-1
Supercell celebrates the lessons from killed games with champagne. Paananen described the practice in his 2016 BAFTA lecture and said at Slush 2024 that it continues.
Attested2 sources2024nordics-failure-2
Vuori and Huy (Administrative Science Quarterly, 2016) attribute part of Nokia's loss in the smartphone race to fear inside the organization. Middle managers, afraid of top management and peers, held back bad news, and top managers overestimated the company's technical capabilities.
Attested1 source2016nordics-failure-3
Netherlands2 claims
ING moved to a Spotify-style structure of squads and tribes in 2015. In a McKinsey interview (2017), it described each tribe writing down its results and biggest learnings every quarter and celebrating both successes and failures.
Attested1 source2017nl-failure-1
According to Thomke (HBR, 2020), only about 10% of Booking.com's experiments produce positive results; the other 90% or so do not support the hypothesis. The company runs its experiments on that assumption.
Attested1 source2020nl-failure-2
Feedback & code review
The Nordics4 claims
On her Evaluating scale, Erin Meyer lists Denmark, alongside the Netherlands and Germany, as an example of a country that gives negative feedback directly.
Attested1 sourcenordics-feedback-1
Carbaugh et al. (Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 2006) describe a Finnish cultural code in which silence and quietude (hiljaisuus) are a positive, natural way of being. Read this way, saying little in a review does not signal agreement.
Attested1 source2006Datednordics-feedback-2
Berry (2011, CercleS) argues that the image of the silent Finn is partly a myth.
Attested1 source2011Datednordics-feedback-3
Lämsä (2010), citing Ekwall and Karlsson (1999), reports that Swedish organizations have been described as avoiding conflict and putting consensus first.
Attested1 source2010Datednordics-feedback-4
Netherlands2 claims
Erin Meyer cites the Netherlands as an example of giving negative feedback directly on her Evaluating scale, and of open disagreement on her Disagreeing scale. Her book says "the Dutch manager learns always to be honest and to give the message straight."
Attested1 sourcenl-feedback-1
Some expat guides link Dutch directness to polder-model consensus building, explaining that speaking your mind freely is a precondition for reaching agreement.
Thin1 sourcenl-feedback-2
Hierarchy & decisions
The Nordics5 claims
Hofstede's power distance (PDI) is low in all four countries, lowest in Denmark at 18. Meyer also cites Denmark and Sweden as examples of egalitarian cultures on her Leading scale.
Attested2 sources2026nordics-hierarchy-1
Lämsä (Review of International Comparative Management, 2010) contrasts the fast, authoritarian Finnish management style, "Management by perkele," with the slower, consensus-seeking Swedish "Management by ack herreguuden."
Attested1 source2010Datednordics-hierarchy-2
Sweden has a practice called förankring: building agreement through informal groundwork before a decision is made. It is often said to slow decisions down but reduce resistance during implementation.
Thin1 sourcenordics-hierarchy-3
Former Spotify PM Jeremiah Lee (2020) wrote that the squad model was an aspiration never fully implemented inside Spotify, and that no single person was accountable for engineering delivery. Former agile coach Joakim Sundén called it "part ambition, part approximation."
Thin1 source2020nordics-hierarchy-4
The Law of Jante (Sandemose, 1933) is treated as a symbol of Nordic egalitarianism, while some commentators argue that it holds back entrepreneurship.
Thin1 sourcenordics-hierarchy-5
Netherlands3 claims
Meyer cites the Netherlands, along with Denmark and Sweden, as an example of an egalitarian culture on her Leading scale. A study guide to The Culture Map places it on the consensual side of the Deciding scale, alongside Sweden and Japan.
Attested2 sourcesnl-hierarchy-1
A study in Contemporary Management Research (2018) analyzed data from 808 managers using structural equation modeling. It found that polder values, reaching pragmatic agreement through consultation and debate, strongly shape the leadership styles Dutch managers prefer.
Well attested1 source2018nl-hierarchy-2
Woldendorp and Keman (2007) reviewed Dutch corporatism from 1965 to 2000 and argue that the polder model has been overrated. Bargaining between the social partners was tough, and the rate of central agreements was low.
Attested1 source2007Datednl-hierarchy-3
Communication & docs
The Nordics3 claims
A study guide to The Culture Map describes Finland as a low-context (explicit) culture, though less so than the United States.
Thin1 sourcenordics-communication-1
Poutiainen (Wiley encyclopedia, 2017) identifies three modes of Finnish communication: silence, a matter-of-fact asiallinen style that sticks to the business at hand, and talk about what it means to be Finnish.
Attested1 source2017nordics-communication-2
According to a summary of The Culture Map, Swedish consensus building relies on meetings and informal groundwork, and foreign managers can be puzzled by how much back-and-forth precedes a decision.
Thin1 sourcenordics-communication-3
Netherlands2 claims
On her Communicating scale, Meyer lists the Netherlands with the United States, Canada and Australia as examples of low-context (explicit) cultures.
Attested1 sourcenl-communication-1
The practical guide NL Compass says that Dutch workplaces take meeting agendas seriously and that fixing schedules in advance is the norm.
Thin1 source2026nl-communication-2
Work & careers
The Nordics4 claims
Eurostat reports that actual weekly hours in the main job in Denmark were 33.9 in 2024, below the EU average of 36.0. Among men in full-time work in 2025, Finland and the Netherlands had the shortest weeks at 38.4 hours, followed by Sweden at 38.5.
Well attested2 sources2026nordics-work-1
Swedish parental leave totals 480 days, with 90 days reserved for each parent. Norway offers 49 weeks at full pay with a 15-week father's quota, and Finland's 2022 reform gives each parent 160 days.
Attested2 sources2025nordics-work-2
A secondary site that aggregates Eurostat's lfsa_ehomp data puts the share of employed people in Finland who usually work from home at 21.1% in 2025.
Attested1 source2025nordics-work-3
Danish flexicurity combines easy dismissal with generous unemployment benefits and active labor market policy, protecting employment rather than any particular job. The IMF (2006) noted a side effect: generous benefits can push up structural unemployment.
Attested2 sources2006Datednordics-work-4
Netherlands2 claims
Eurostat reports that actual weekly hours in the main job were 32.1 in 2024, the shortest in the EU (EU average 36.0). The main reason is the high share of part-time work; men in full-time work averaged 38.4 hours (2025).
Well attested2 sources2026nl-work-1
CBS reports that 52% of employed people worked from home at least sometimes in 2023. In the 2022 EU comparison, 12.7% worked from home most of the time, lower than in Finland (23.1%) or Ireland (25.3%).
Well attested1 source2024nl-work-2
Open source & community
The Nordics5 claims
Linux began on 1991-08-25, when Linus Torvalds, then a student at the University of Helsinki, posted to comp.os.minix that it was "just a hobby, won't be big and professional like gnu."
Attested1 sourcenordics-oss-1
MySQL AB was a Swedish company founded in 1995, with one of its headquarters in Uppsala. Co-founder and main MySQL author Michael Widenius is Finnish, born in Helsinki. Sun bought the company in 2008 for about $1 billion, and MariaDB later forked from MySQL.
Attested2 sourcesnordics-oss-2
Erlang was created at Ericsson in 1986. According to Armstrong (HOPL III, 2007), Ericsson Radio's 1998 ban on using it in new products led to its open-source release on December 2 of that year.
Well attested1 source2007Datednordics-oss-3
Norwegians Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard laid the foundations of object orientation with Simula and received the Turing Award in 2001. Qt came out of Norway's Trolltech (founded 1994), and today's Qt Group is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.
Attested2 sources2001Datednordics-oss-4
David Heinemeier Hansson, the creator of Ruby on Rails, is Danish. Rails was released in 2004.
Attested1 sourcenordics-oss-5
Netherlands2 claims
On 2018-07-12, Guido van Rossum stepped down as Python's BDFL in a python-committers post titled "Transfer of power." He named no successor and left it to the core developers to decide how the project would be governed.
Well attested1 source2018nl-oss-1
ING brought the Spotify model to a large bank, organizing about 350 squads into 13 tribes (McKinsey, 2017).
Attested1 source2017nl-oss-2