IndiavsChina
インドと中国INCN
Seen from India: each line below describes China relative to India.
Culture Map: eight scales
Erin Meyer's eight scales, sorted by how far apart India and China sit, largest gap first.
Filled dot: India, where you are looking fromHollow ring: China
Where you will notice the difference3 scales
Communicating
China leaves more to be read between the lines than India (1 step)
India +1, China +2, on a line from −3 (Low-context) to +3 (High-context).
Deciding
China leaves decisions to the person in charge more than India (1 step)
India +1, China +2, on a line from −3 (Consensual) to +3 (Top-down).
Disagreeing
China avoids open disagreement more than India (1 step)
India +1, China +2, on a line from −3 (Confrontational) to +3 (Avoids confrontation).
Where you are close2 scales
Evaluating
India and China sit on the same step
India +1, China +1, on a line from −3 (Direct negative feedback) to +3 (Indirect negative feedback).
Trusting
India and China sit on the same step
India +2, China +2, on a line from −3 (Task-based) to +3 (Relationship-based).
Not placed3 scales
These scales are left unmarked: either Meyer leaves a country off the scale or no source places it, and drawing it anyway would be guessing.
- PersuadingMeyer leaves China off this scale and describes its reasoning as holistic; no source places India on it
- LeadingNo source places India on this scale
- SchedulingNo source places China on this scale
Hofstede: six dimensions
Scores from 0 to 100, sorted by the gap between India and China. They describe national averages, not either country's character.
Long-term orientation
China scores 26 points higher than India (77 against 51)
India 51, China 77, on a line from 0 (Short-term) to 100 (Long-term).
Individualism
China scores 19 points higher than India (43 against 24)
India 24, China 43, on a line from 0 (Collectivist) to 100 (Individualist).
Motivation towards achievement and success
China scores 10 points higher than India (66 against 56)
India 56, China 66, on a line from 0 (Consensus-oriented) to 100 (Decisive).
Uncertainty avoidance
China scores 10 points lower than India (30 against 40)
India 40, China 30, on a line from 0 (Tolerant of ambiguity) to 100 (Avoids ambiguity).
Power distance
China scores 3 points higher than India (80 against 77)
India 77, China 80, on a line from 0 (Low power distance) to 100 (High power distance).
Indulgence
China scores 2 points lower than India (24 against 26)
India 26, China 24, on a line from 0 (Restrained) to 100 (Indulgent).
What the sources say, theme by theme
Entries for India and China, side by side on wide screens. Each keeps its own confidence label and citations.
Design & quality
India4 claims
TCS announced in 2011 that it had been assessed at CMMI Level 5 enterprise-wide for both CMMI-DEV and CMMI-SVC, and says it was the first company in the world to reach enterprise-wide Level 5 for SVC.
Well attested1 source2011Datedin-design-1
Hiring-industry articles contrast services firms ("specs are king, process-heavy, ticket-driven") with product companies ("design docs, code review, CI/CD"). Neither is backed by research.
Thin2 sourcesin-design-2
The idea that jugaad (improvised fixes under constraints) is a virtue in software development draws criticism from Indian engineers themselves, on Hacker News and elsewhere. Others defend it as frugal engineering, such as designing apps that work on 2G connections.
Thin3 sourcesin-design-3
Zerodha is India's largest stockbroker, yet its tech team of 33–35 people self-hosts the entire stack. CTO Kailash Nadh says it is a misconception that team size must grow in proportion to the number of users.
Attested2 sources2024in-design-4
China3 claims
In AI Superpowers (2018), Kai-Fu Lee argued that a "gladiator" competition that puts speed first and accepts copying produced Chinese startups' rapid iteration. Critics say the book glorifies imitation.
Attested2 sources2019cn-design-1
From around 1998–99, Huawei adopted IBM's IPD (Integrated Product Development), required teams to follow the templates exactly, and enforced a heavy stage-gate process.
Attested2 sourcescn-design-2
In November 2023, Alibaba Cloud had its second major outage in a month, and in the same month Didi apologized for a service breakdown it blamed on a failure in underlying software.
Attested2 sources2023cn-design-3
Failure & risk
India3 claims
According to Meyer's 2017 HBR article, in top-down decision-making cultures, India among them, decisions are made quickly but can change as new input or arguments arise. A decision is treated as a placeholder that can be adjusted later, not a firm commitment.
Attested1 source2017in-failure-1
On Meyer's Scheduling scale, India is on the flexible-time side, described as running several things in parallel, accepting interruptions and prioritizing adaptation.
Attested1 sourcein-failure-2
The claim that offshore teams do not escalate bad news rests on anecdotes on Hacker News. Other HN commenters counter that US-side managers often have not built a structure that invites pushback.
Thin2 sources2024in-failure-3
China2 claims
Fupan, a review method named after replaying a game of Go move by move, is used in Chinese companies. A former Lenovo executive calls it a pillar of the company's culture and cites founder Liu Chuanzhi's instruction to think things through without sparing yourself.
Thin2 sourcescn-failure-1
Meyer gives the example of Chinese managers learning not to criticize colleagues in public.
Attested1 sourcecn-failure-2
Feedback & code review
India2 claims
An article summarizing Meyer's eight scales places India toward the high-context end and on the side that avoids confrontation.
Attested1 sourcein-feedback-1
Rastogi et al. (ESEM 2018), analyzing about 70,000 GitHub pull requests, found that in 16 of 17 countries, pull requests were more likely to be accepted when the submitter and reviewer were from the same country. India was the exception: acceptance fell by 7.4% when the maintainer was also from India.
Attested1 source2019in-feedback-2
China3 claims
Explainers of Meyer's Culture Map place China on the high-context side and describe negative feedback as tending to be indirect, especially when it could cost someone face.
Thin2 sources2026cn-feedback-1
Empirical studies of Chinese workplaces find that employees stay silent more when they perceive their supervisor's coercive power as strong and when they work under authoritarian leaders. Face (mianzi), guanxi and the doctrine of the mean (zhongyong) are discussed as factors that suppress speaking up.
Well attested3 sources2025cn-feedback-2
In Rastogi et al. (ESEM 2018), which analyzed GitHub pull request acceptance by country, pull requests from China fell in the lower-acceptance group. The cause of the gap was not identified; nationality bias and English proficiency are possible factors.
Attested1 source2019cn-feedback-3
Hierarchy & decisions
India3 claims
Meyer's 2017 HBR article places India in the top-down, hierarchical quadrant, together with Brazil, China, France, Indonesia, Mexico, Russia and Saudi Arabia.
Attested1 source2017in-hierarchy-1
India scores 77 on Hofstede's power distance (PDI), its highest of the six dimensions. The Culture Factor describes this as an appreciation of hierarchy and top-down structure.
Attested1 source2026in-hierarchy-2
A hiring-industry article contrasts services firms, which run on approval chains and hierarchy, with product startups, where engineers can talk to founders directly and decisions are fast.
Thin1 sourcein-hierarchy-3
China2 claims
Meyer's 2017 HBR article places China in the top-down, hierarchical quadrant. In the case of a US company that expanded to China, Chinese staff saw American managers who did not give detailed instructions as "not just incompetent but arrogant".
Attested1 source2017cn-hierarchy-1
ByteDance is reported to have adopted Zhang Yiming's "Context, not Control", making internal documents open by default, running OKRs on a two-month cycle and sharing information through Feishu (Lark).
Attested2 sourcescn-hierarchy-2
Communication & docs
India2 claims
In the EF EPI 2024, India ranked 69th of 116 countries and regions. English is widely used as a working language, but India's rank on this test is mid-table.
Attested1 source2024in-communication-1
Explainers of Meyer's Trusting scale place India on the relationship-based side, where trust built through personal relationships is needed before work begins.
Thin1 sourcein-communication-2
China4 claims
In 2022, the Beijing No. 3 Intermediate People's Court ruled that handling work on WeChat outside working hours counted as overtime and ordered the former employer to pay 30,000 yuan. In January 2024, the Supreme People's Court and other bodies published a similar case as a model case.
Attested2 sources2024cn-communication-1
ByteDance's Feishu (Lark) combines documents, meetings, chat and OKRs in one tool and is sold to outside companies as an "organizational operating system".
Attested1 sourcecn-communication-2
In the EF EPI 2024, China ranked 91st of 116 countries and regions (score 455), but city scores such as Beijing (518) and Shanghai (511) are far above the national figure.
Attested1 source2024cn-communication-3
A 2021 study of open source projects at Baidu, Alibaba and Tencent found that providing an English README was the most common internationalization measure.
Attested1 source2021cn-communication-4
Work & careers
India5 claims
NASSCOM estimated India's tech industry revenue for FY2025 at about $282.6 billion, with 5.8 million employees (a net addition of 126,000). A 2026 revision raised these to $297 billion and 5.82 million.
Attested2 sources2026in-work-1
According to NASSCOM and Zinnov, India had more than 1,700 global capability centers (GCCs) of foreign companies employing more than 1.9 million people as of FY2024. GCCs are also spreading to tier-2 cities.
Attested2 sources2024in-work-2
Attrition at the large IT services firms swings with the business cycle. In Q2 FY23 it was 27.1% at Infosys, 23% at Wipro and 21.5% at TCS; by Q4 FY24 it had fallen to 12.5% at TCS and 12.6% at Infosys.
Attested2 sources2024in-work-3
According to USCIS, 72.3% of H-1B petitions approved in FY2023 were for people born in India; 11.7% were for people born in China.
Well attested2 sources2025in-work-4
In 2023, Infosys founder Narayana Murthy said young Indians should work 70 hours a week. The remark drew strong backlash on social media but support from some business leaders, and public opinion split.
Attested2 sources2023in-work-5
China4 claims
In March 2019, the GitHub repository 996.ICU went up in protest against overwork and passed 1,000 stars within its first hour. In August 2021, the Supreme People's Court and the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Security published typical cases stating that the 996 schedule is illegal.
Attested3 sources2021cn-work-1
In 2021, Kuaishou and ByteDance ended the alternating six-day week (daxiaozhou). At ByteDance the loss of overtime pay cut take-home pay by 17% on average, and an internal poll reportedly found about 30% wanted to keep the old schedule.
Attested2 sources2021cn-work-2
News reports describe a "curse of 35" in which people over 35 are disadvantaged in layoffs and hiring. In a recruitment platform's survey, 87% of programmers were worried about losing their job or finding a new one after 35. Chinese labor law does not explicitly ban age discrimination.
Attested3 sources2025cn-work-3
As a reaction to neijuan (involution), reports describe tangping (lying flat), people leaving high-paying jobs for a 10-to-6, five-day schedule, and runxue (emigrating). Layoffs at big tech firms are also said to be pushing new graduates toward civil service jobs.
Attested3 sources2025cn-work-4
Open source & community
India4 claims
According to GitHub Octoverse 2025, India has 21.9 million developers, second only to the US (up from 4.5 million in 2020). More than 5 million joined in 2025 alone.
Well attested1 source2025in-oss-1
- GitHub Octoverse 2025 (2025)
The same Octoverse 2025 report says India has already overtaken the US to have the world's largest base of public and open source contributors, and projects 57.5 million developers in India by 2030.
Well attested1 source2025in-oss-2
- GitHub Octoverse 2025 (2025)
Zerodha launched FLOSS/fund in October 2024 to give $1 million a year to open source projects worldwide. In 2025 it paid out a total of $1 million to projects including Blender, FFmpeg and OpenSSL.
Attested2 sources2025in-oss-3
Zerodha CTO Kailash Nadh says India uses FOSS heavily but its contributions are negligible, and has proposed a government-backed sovereign FOSS fund.
Attested1 sourcein-oss-4
China5 claims
OSS Compass estimates that China has more than 2.2 million active open source developers, the most of any country (India has about 2 million).
Attested1 source2025cn-oss-1
In 2020, MIIT contracted a consortium of companies and universities led by Gitee to build a Chinese independent open source hosting platform. In May 2022, Gitee began reviewing all public code before publication and hid large numbers of repositories without notice.
Attested2 sources2022cn-oss-2
A CUHK study found that commits on Gitee dropped sharply after the platform introduced pre-publication review of public code.
Well attested1 source2025cn-oss-3
Ten of 28 projects in the ASF incubator came from Chinese companies. TiDB, from PingCAP (founded in Beijing in 2015), has about 40,000 GitHub stars and more than 1,200 contributors.
Attested3 sources2023cn-oss-4
OpenHarmony is based on code Huawei donated to the OpenAtom Foundation in 2020–21. As of January 2025 it had 401 ecosystem partners, but its leading contributors are concentrated in Huawei and its affiliates.
Attested2 sources2025cn-oss-5