The door was the VPN
日本語

CasesS=1:500S=1:100

Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center ransomware: the way in

A maintenance SSL-VPN appliance with a guessable password, no updates since 2018 and no source-IP limit was the way in.

Okayama Psychiatric Medical CenterHospital, prefectural, psychiatricJPRansomware

1 Summary

At about 16:00 on Sunday, May 19, 2024, the hospital's electronic medical records stopped working. The next morning the vendor found ransomware. Forensics later showed that the intruder had been inside since 02:41 on May 13. Personal data of up to 40,000 people was leaked. The investigation committee placed the entry at the maintenance SSL-VPN appliance in the data center.

Probable cause: A maintenance SSL-VPN appliance with a guessable password, no updates since 2018 and no source-IP limit was the way in.

VPNOutsideInternal network
Fig. 4-4-1Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center, the way in

Source: Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee 「ランサムウェア事案調査報告書」 (pp.12–13, 16–17, 20–21, 30–31)

S=1:100 2 Factual information

2.1 The way in

The committee: the maintenance VPN appliance had no source-IP restriction, so "anyone on the internet could attack it." It lists three possible causes: a dictionary attack on the SSL-VPN, credentials bought from an initial access broker, or exploitation of an SSL-VPN vulnerability.

Source: Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee 「ランサムウェア事案調査報告書」 (pp.12–13, 16–17, 20–21, 30–31)

Product
Cisco ASA 5506-X (SSL-VPN for maintenance)
CVE
Not stated

2.2 After entry

For about six days the intruder scanned the network, searched for and destroyed backups, took user and computer information from Active Directory, stopped and deleted antivirus, and copied Office documents from shared folders. Encryption ran from 13:10 to 17:34 on May 19: 23 virtual servers, the shared storage, 3 virtualization hosts, 6 other physical servers and 244 terminals. All data on the shared storage was lost. The contracted offline backup had not been taken correctly.

2.3 Damage

Medical records went down at the hospital and its clinic. Staff used paper charts and care did not stop. Okayama Prefectural Police confirmed a leak of personal data, estimated at up to 40,000 people, including names, addresses, dates of birth and diagnoses. Full recovery took about three months, using a data-warehouse server that had escaped encryption.

2.4 Sequence of events

TimeActorEventSource
2024-05-13 02:41IntruderFirst confirmed entry. Daily network scans, theft of Active Directory data and shared-folder data, and a search for backups follow until May 18.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
2024-05-14 22:56IntruderRemote logon to an Active Directory server; a network scanner is installed.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
2024-05-16IntruderFrom May 16 to 18, credentials taken from the Active Directory server and backup data deleted.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
2024-05-19 13:10IntruderEncryption of servers and terminals begins; it ends at 17:34.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
c. 2024-05-19 16:00HospitalStaff find the medical records stopped and call the vendor.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
c. 2024-05-20 06:15VendorFinds files with a suspicious extension in the backups; ransomware confirmed.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
c. 2024-05-20 07:00HospitalTask force decides to continue inpatient and outpatient care on paper charts.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
2024-05-20 16:00HospitalAnnounces on its website that the medical records are down after a cyberattack.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
2025-02-13Investigation committeeInvestigation report published.Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee

S=1:100 3 Analysis

PointFindingSource
The SSL-VPN's ID and password were guessable, and the same pair was the Windows administrator credential on every machine.StatedSoftware ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
No source-IP restriction was set on the maintenance VPN appliance.StatedSoftware ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
First entry is confirmed at 02:41 on May 13, 2024, from server forensics.StatedSoftware ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
Which of the three causes applied: a dictionary attack, bought credentials, or a vulnerability.PresumedSoftware ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee
The VPN appliance's own record. Its syslog was kept only in a small in-memory buffer and had been overwritten.UnknownSoftware ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee

S=1:100 4 Conclusions

The committee concluded that the intruder came in through the maintenance SSL-VPN appliance, then used the same administrator credentials everywhere to spread, steal data and encrypt. It wrote that most of the weaknesses could easily have been prevented by following the health ministry's guideline.

S=1:100 5 Recommendations

Recommended or carried out by: Hospital (measures implemented, as listed in the committee's report)

  1. Replace the VPN with a service that has multi-factor authentication and source restriction.
  2. Stop using the built-in Administrator; give every administrator a unique ID with a password of 16 or more characters.
  3. Restrict Remote Desktop by source and set lockout.
  4. Run the medical-record system with standard user accounts.
  5. Renew the firewall in front of vendors' own VPN appliances and restrict their source IPs.
  6. Lock an account after five consecutive failed logins.

Source: Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee 「ランサムウェア事案調査報告書」 (pp.12–13, 16–17, 20–21, 30–31)

Sources

Source: Software ISAC, Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center investigation committee 「ランサムウェア事案調査報告書」 (pp.12–13, 16–17, 20–21, 30–31)

Type a product, a CVE ID, a case or a term.